Sunday, April 26, 2009

A Student’s Perspective on the Controversy

By Jaclyn Azia

4/27/09

A Student’s Perspective on the Controversy

College Sophomore Shares Knowledge on Nuclear Power

Ask the average environmentalist what their view on nuclear power is, and most will say that they strongly oppose it.

“Most environmental groups are against nuclear power, just because of the waste issue,” said Lauren Krizel, 20, Vice President of the Eco-Sense club at American University. “The waste is really hard to contain, and can be radioactive for thousands of years.”

Krizel, an Environmental Studies major, said that nuclear waste is stored in on-site cooling ponds at nuclear power plants, but that this is only a “temporary fix.”

“Radiation that’s leaked out of repositories or cooling ponds could cause cancer over time. Or if it’s a high dose it could cause cancer pretty quickly,” she said.

Supporters of nuclear power argue that it is very efficient for electricity, as it is a “low carbon” means of generating electricity. Additionally, the nuclear power industry believes nuclear technology is both safe and cost-effective. Yet, fears associated with contamination are widespread, especially in the environmentalist community.

An Environmental Group’s Response

Greenpeace has always been vehemently against the use of nuclear power because of the environmental, health and security issues associated with it, according to a statement on their website. Radioactive waste, the risk of accidents, and the threat to global security are issues that Greenpeace has addressed in their attempts to end the use of nuclear power.

The group released a briefing on April 20 titled “Nuclear Power: A Dangerous Waste of Time,” which details why renewable energy, not nuclear power, is the best solution to the climate crisis.

Concerns about nuclear weapons are also a hot issue for Greenpeace. Even after 2,000 nuclear weapons tests and contamination across the globe, the number of countries with active weapons programs is still increasing. Alarmed by this and the lack of action the U.S. government has taken, Greenpeace continues to push for disarmament.

A Possible Solution

Like Greenpeace, Krizel sees the dangers posed by nuclear power, especially if radiation were to get into the water supply. However, she sees the benefits of a repository like the one being planned at Yucca Mountain.

“Reprocessing and recycling the waste could be good solution because there would be a lot less of it,” she said.

Yucca Mountain, located in a remote, desert area in Nevada, is a proposed site for spent nuclear fuel. The Department of Energy has applied for a license to build a repository and is conducting ongoing research to ensure the safety of such a project.

“Yucca would hypothetically be a good site for storing waste,” said Krizel. “There’s so much local opposition though, because people are scared of the potential harm of the nuclear energy.”

Krizel also said that the U.S. could consider reprocessing their nuclear waste the way that France does. As a country that has a lot of nuclear power, France uses the leftover waste—plutonium—for fuel, which reduces the amount of waste that has to be stored.


Links to related webpages:

Greenpeace:

http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/campaigns/nuclear

http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/usa/press-center/reports4/nuclear-power-a-dangerous-was.pdf

U.S. Department of Energy – Yucca Mountain Repository:

http://www.ocrwm.doe.gov/ym_repository/index.shtml#0


##

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

American Forum

By Jaclyn Azia

A decrease in mainstream news coverage of the White House and federal agencies, as well as an increase in the presence of foreign correspondents in Washington, D.C., have significant implications for investigative reporting in the nation’s capital, a panel of industry leaders said Tuesday.

During an American Forum entitled “Washington Watchdogs: An Endangered Species?” reporters and editors from both print and broadcast said Washington journalism is facing more challenges than ever and the future of how American democracy functions could be at stake.

“There’s no question that mainstream media is under increasing financial pressure,” said Mark Whitaker. With less money, organizations are looking for ways to cut back, he said.

Another concern voiced by Mark Whitaker, Senior Vice President of NBC News, concerns information that reporters get from confidential sources. The danger, he said, lies in what you loose “when you have fewer veteran reporters who know how to get that kind of confidential information and have news organizations behind them that are willing to go to bat to protect them.”

As reporters begin working in greater numbers for niche media outlets, a main concern is how well citizens will be informed and what they will read and have access to, according to panelist Tyler Marshall, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist.

Moderated by Professor Wendell Cochran, the Forum addressed issues concerning Internet media, financial pressures, and the importance of eyewitness journalism.

Suzanne Struglinski, senior editor of Provider magazine and a former regional reporter for the Deseret News, said individual cities and towns are losing their Washington presence when bureaus populated by reporters with regional ties are closed.

“They’re not going to get the details and information on their delegations specifically that a bigger news organization [would get],” said Struglinski. “They’re not going to pay attention to it in a way that a local newspaper will.” This is because reporters won’t have that institutional knowledge or a relationship with the members of Congress that local reporters have.

Melinda Wittstock, CEO of Capitol News Connection, stressed the need for reporters to be in Washington to cover stories – what she called eyewitness journalism.

“If you’re not there, you can’t see the context,” she said.

Since there has been a decrease in eyewitness journalism, citizens who are voting their congressmen into office are not getting all of the information they should.

Marshall agreed with Wittstock, saying, “They [citizens] are not getting objective, unfiltered feedback on how their representatives are acting.” He said this is due, in part, to the fact that the press releases being issued by the representatives’ staff are not always objective.

One student posed a question about how the Internet affects the jobs of Washington watchdogs. On the one hand, the alternatives offered by the Web have had devastating effects on the business model. Whitaker says that although subscribers are paying, there is “tremendous pressure to put it out there for free.”

On the other hand, though, the Web has allowed for job opportunities and industry expansion. Marshall said that the internet is actually adding jobs, at least in the short term. Additionally, most newspapers in the U.S. are growing specifically in the area of web-related work.

“In this town, blogs are a growth industry,” said Marshall, and he called some of the content “darn good.”

The panelists agreed that blogs are here to stay. Struglinski said blogs are a great news-gathering device and a good way to write shorter stories.

However, Whitaker stressed that reporters must be cautious in their use of blogs and social networking sites like Twitter.

“As much as we want to embrace the new forms of media, we have to be extremely disciplined,” he said, to make sure reporters are not sacrificing the time it takes to gather necessary information.

Struglinski agreed, saying, “What’s better, fast or correct?” She said the answer is always going to be ‘correct.’

Panelists were optimistic in response to questions about the future for journalism students.

Whitaker said, “there’s more room for entrepreneurship that there’s ever been.”

“Being a journalist is the best thing you could do,” said Struglinski. “It’s a front seat to history.”

##

Saturday, February 21, 2009

A Romantic, a Reporter, and a Professor

By Jaclyn Azia

            At 5:30 a.m. on Nov. 20, 1968, a coal mine exploded near Farmington, W. Va. Miners and emergency workers rushed to help potential victims and local reporters rushed to cover the disaster. Wendell Cochran, a senior at West Virginia University 30 miles away, was one of those reporters.

            “It was a beautiful mid-November afternoon, with long shadows on the hillsides, contrasted by smoke billowing out of the mine shaft,” said Cochran. “I asked the company official, ‘Where is the fire compared to where we are?’ He pointed straight down. It was a sobering realization that then miners were dying.”

In the end, 78 miners died, ranking the explosion in the top five worst coal mine disasters since 1940. As Cochran reported the story alongside the national press, something poignant occurred to the then-journalism student: “I was doing what they were doing,” said Cochran. “I was young and I was just starting to understand the effects of our work on people.”

            From this experience, Cochran learned that in the news business, big stories are not always happy events, but he also learned that journalism was a vital profession that he wanted to pursue. Thus, he spent the next 25 years as a reporter.

            “Journalism is the most important thing that happens in a democracy,” said Cochran, who considers himself a shameless romantic in regard to the profession. His passion for journalism eventually translated into teaching the subject. He has been a professor in the School of Communication at American University since 1992, serving as the division director from 2001 to 2008. After nearly 17 years of working at American University, Cochran said he loves everything about the campus community. In fact, he loves it so much he has made it his home since the fall of 2007.

Along with his wife, Faye, Cochran lives in Nebraska Hall, the newest student resident hall for upper classmen, on the north side of campus. As the faculty-in-residence, he lives on the terrace, in an apartment-style dorm suite, not unlike that of the 130 students in the building.

            “I like the idea of students and faculty living together,” said Cochran. He said students may be hesitant about living next door to a professor, but he enjoys the everyday interactions. He often sits in the terrace lounge and has conversations with students who pass through. He has also hosted several events for the hall, including an inauguration-watch party for the swearing in of Barack Obama.

            “He wants to be part of the university community at all times,” said Jimm Phillips, a former student of Cochran’s and now the editor of The Eagle, the campus newspaper. He has taken journalism ethics and multimedia design and production with Cochran and says that while he’s a tough professor, “he challenges you to do better; to go above and beyond.”

            Cochran maintains the belief that there’s “no such thing as a perfect story,” which is one of the reasons he doesn’t particularly enjoy grading. “It’s the notion that we would essentially assign values to people,” he said. “I’d much rather coach and work with people rather than give ‘gotcha’ tests and quizzes.”

            Besides the three upper-level communication classes Cochran presently teaches, his journalism interests extend beyond the classroom and into the fast-paced, changing world of reporting. As of the spring of 2008, he is the senior editor of the Investigative Reporting Workshop. As part of the School of Communication, the Workshop conducts research on national and international journalism projects, to create models of greater supervision of government and other private institutions.

After recently retiring from the position of journalism division chair, Cochran has been able to become a real leader in this new and critical field of investigative journalism, according to Amy Eisman, a colleague of Cochran’s. Additionally, he regularly researches the administration of the Freedom of Information Act.

“All of those are titles and jobs,” says Eisman, of Cochran’s various positions and accomplishments. “He’s just as passionate about taking pictures of flowers.”

In his free time, Cochran enjoys photography, and is an avid reader. In addition to his daily dose of The New York Times and The Washington Post, Cochran admits that for pleasure, he reads “trashy crime and spy novels,” and currently has two or three of them started. He enjoys reading Thomas Wolfe and Ernest Hemingway, in addition to non-fiction works. This passion for reading is strongly rooted in his childhood.

“I come from a family where reading and getting access to information has always been important, so it probably wasn’t that surprising that I ended up doing things with words,” said Cochran.

In the 1930s, his grandmother ran a mule-back bookmobile in the hills of eastern Kentucky. His mother continued this tradition by establishing a bookmobile in West Virginia, where Cochran grew up.

Cochran says that his passionate reading habit is simply part of the nature of all journalists. “It’s how we sustain ourselves. It’s how we get information,” he said. “If we’re trying to be critical and we’re trying to learn, we’re trying to deconstruct what the writer or reporter was trying to do so we can see the structure behind it.”

            Eisman, who was hired by Cochran in 2002 to teach in the School of Communication, describes him as a “hardworking kid from West Virginia with all the ethics that go with that.” While Cochran admits he’s been extremely lucky in his career, he says he has faced intellectual challenges along the way.

            As a leader in the recent field of computer-assisted reporting, Cochran has been working to develop new strategies and innovations in a technologically advancing world. He teaches a class on the subject, but says that no one was teaching that when he was in school.

            “He’s been there as the field has evolved,” said Tony Romm, another of Cochran’s students and a senior journalism major. Romm said that because Cochran can apply his outside knowledge to what he’s teaching, it “colors the entire experience” and gives insight into where the field of journalism is going.

            Cochran faced challenges in his early career that many young journalists face. While writing for his college newspaper, Cochran made an error in a front-page story, which he says “made my professor completely unhappy.” He often covered complex subjects such as business and banking. “I had virtually no training or education to cover [those topics],” said Cochran.

            Cochran doesn’t remember the first story he wrote, but he still has his first byline, and keeps it on a shelf in his office. He stands firm in his belief that journalism is still an essential field despite widespread predictions of doom for the profession. He tries to instill his students with that same vigor.

            “He really believes that people should be hungry for the truth and they should work hard for what they get,” said Eisman. “He gets very upset when people aren’t as enthusiastic as he is about rooting up corruption and getting to the fire of things.”

            To those who don’t know him well, he may seem tough, but according to Eisman, “He’s a curmudgeon on the outside, and a marshmallow on the inside.”

            In her first week, she remembers asking him, “How do you do this whole teaching thing?” He gave her the best advice anyone could have given her: “‘You are the queen of the classroom. Once you’re in there, it’s totally up to you,’” she said. She found his words to be empowering and often passes it on to other newly hired professors.

            Cochran is able to similarly inspire students to realize that careers in journalism are “immensely important,” despite the challenges they may face. In today’s world, there is more information than ever, and a certain level of complexity that was either not present or overlooked when Cochran entered the field.

“As our world has gotten more interconnected and as our problems have grown, it’s clear to us that solutions to problems can’t be one-sided,” said Cochran. “For journalists, trying to explain a more complex world makes it a harder job, but it also makes it a more important job.”

 

##



Wednesday, February 4, 2009

A Seasoned Witness to History


January 20, 2009


Marie Iszkowski stood at the presidential inauguration of Barack Obama wearing a floor-length winter coat decorated with pins, a turtleneck sweater that came up to her mouth, a fleece hat, a scarf, and gloves—an attire completely different than the last time she stood on the National Mall with so many people to watch history take place. That was summertime – August 28, 1963, to be exact – the day that Martin Luther King, Jr., gave his famous “I Have a Dream” speech.

“I knew it was the right thing to do and I feel very much like that today,” the 66-year-old Arlington, Va., resident explained, in reference to her attendance at King’s speech.

Despite the difference in weather, there were many similarities between the two events, Iszkowski said. For one, she said, the attendees at each event were enthralled in the moment, simply listening to the speech and looking at all of the people standing around them. She also said that she believes people will look back on Obama’s inauguration with many of the same emotions that they looked back on King’s speech with.

On a summer evening, King spoke before a crowd of over 250,000 people who had taken part in the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. From the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, King delivered his 11-minute speech to supporters of desegregation. His speech was instrumental in mobilizing Americans, leading to the passing of the Civil Rights Act in 1964, under the Kennedy Administration.

Forty-six years later, although the crowd size and security forces were greatly enlarged, the inauguration drew a similar throng looking for change. “There’s a definite link,” said Iszkowski, explaining the relationship between the two momentous events.

Iszkowski, born in France, has lived in Arlington for 40 years. She was barely 22 when she saw King speak. “I walked across Memorial Bridge. It seems like a very normal, logical thing to do, but at that time, things were not so obvious to everybody, including my mother. So, it was sort of a brave thing for a young girl to do.”

Although Iszkowski stood adjacent to the Washington Monument during the inauguration, 6,336 feet from the Capitol steps, she was in high spirits. “He [Obama] is an extraordinary human being. I’m very happy to be here.”

“This is a very exciting moment,” said Greta Morris of Arlington, a friend of Iszkowski’s. With wide eyes and a huge smile, Morris emitted a similar energy at the Washington Monument. She explained that she was attending her first inauguration because she has supported Obama since she saw him speak at the Democratic Convention in 2004.

“I said, ‘This man should be president of the United States,’ and I’ve been very excited throughout the campaign and thrilled that he won,” said Morris. A California native, Morris has always watched inaugurations on television and was excited to finally hear an inaugural address in person. Pleased with how polite everyone was, Morris noted the optimism of the crowd. “People of course seem to be in such a great mood, very happy, and very excited,” she said.

Chuck Hogeboom of Fairfax County attended Ronald Reagan’s first inauguration and many others. He, too, had an upbeat tone about Obama’s inauguration. “It’s always been a pretty exciting day.” Despite the freezing temperature, he even noted that the weather was “pretty good here today,” compared to some past inaugurations he has attended.